| |
| | ||||
| ||||
| What are around pros and cons of switch to an E rooter? I had people state IT'll do good and some say information technology'll do bad. What do you think? __________________ |
| Show and never see these ads again. |
| | |||
| |||
| Subscribed. I'd the likes of to see where this goes. Might be interested in converting too. __________________ |
| | |||
| |||
| I put an e-winnow on my '00 3.0 and induce been happy with it... I've got a little more power, especially at throttle tip in, my mpg went up, and information technology's more than quieter than the stock fan. I built an aluminum shroud for mine. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I dont think on that point is much to be gained. I went from the clutch sports fan to a deform sports fan. (I had overheating problems with my plow). I love the thing. I did not notice whatsoever difference in mpg's or hp in either direction. Simply the twist winnow sure does be active a shit ton more strain! Im also non a fan of depending along an electric motor to keep my engine nerveless.... |
| | |||
| |||
| An e-fan is non remotely the said thing as a twist fan, then information technology's nonsensical to compare the 2. The vast majority of the vehicles being factory-made today use whatever type of electric radiator fan and it's extremely rare to hear anyone complain of overheated engines. Many cross-country racing trucks also utilisation electric radiator fans without any job, so it would seem foolish to cost fearful that an e-fan on a Ranger won't keep IT's locomotive engine cool. |
| | |||
| |||
| What you're doing is replacing rotating heap on the H2O pump which allows the engine to gain a some more Horsepower non a lot. You should possess few problems with an eFan. The only progeny is how to wire it up and the temporary sensor locating. You can google the topic and find a lot of information there. Gerald R. Ford Taurus eFan would be the top solution since it has two speeds on one fan efferent and determination them in a Recycled Parts yard is evenhandedly easy and cheaper than buying a new one if your not sure of the change. __________________ |
| | ||||
| ||||
| i love mine. never will i run physical science over again. __________________ 06 Commando XLT |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I erotic love the picture and information posted by KZEE. I just bought a 2000 and was wondering about power gain and mpg. Nice lin on the rebirth. Have you got whatever numbers on the mpg gain? |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Negligible deviation. Mostly upright quieter. Some citizenry report gains, some written report none. I cogitate it's not worth doing if you're doing it for MPG gains lonely; you'll be very disappointed with the results. I prefer mechanical myself. __________________ Quote: Originally Posted aside writtenaudio Man wish i had tits, seems like its easier to get a job if you have tits. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I give birth a couple Taurus e fans for sale if anyone is concerned __________________ |
| |
| Inverted comma: Originally Posted past Ranger01 I have a couple Taurus e fans for sales event if anyone is interested What year are the fans from? Or a better question would be how big are the fans your merchandising? One-member or dual? Do they come with a weather sheet? And wire draw rein? |
| | ||||
| ||||
| I remember a previous thread happening this... Electric would be superior to any mechanical fan when it comes to operation. The electric output signal of the alternator is plenty to mind of the load and that bit of additive load is to a lesser degree the rotating mass and immunity caused by the mechanical fan set up. That agency less horsepower to operate the engine leaving that little bit more to supply drive. The truck should get best performance, which whitethorn or may not be noticeable, and amend mpg by a few mpg. And you have to figure the fan will run the priggish speed permanently cooling regardless of engine speed. A friend got 4-5 mpg win when putting an electric car fan on his 2.5 Chevy S10. Clearly it would take some fourth dimension for pay off, but it would eventually pay for itself. If there was a 3 mpg gain that would mean saving about a gallon of gas all 140 miles or so on a 21 mpg vehicle that would convey 24 mpg. That would represent worthy about $3.50 all 140 miles. If you can do it for $70 it would contain 2800 miles to give out the cost with the savings. As for dependability, virtually all liquid cooled road motorcycles apply electrical fans (only the early Honda CX500 utilised a automatic sports fan to my cognition). Probably 95% of totally cars have since the 90s too. I might consider that for a summer project myself. __________________ Last edited by markk53; 12-10-2013 at 08:15 Phase modulation. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Cite: Originally Posted by bravebowhunter What year are the fans from? Or a improved wonder would be how big are the fans your selling? Single or dual? Do they come with a shroud? And wire harness? They are from a 93 Their single they have a should and ii of them have a pigtail. 2 do not __________________ |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Mark, get ready for some reading. Multiple citizenry have shown no significant or proven mpg or power addition. Proof of electric fan myth Now putting an efan along a lilliputian G 2.5 litre pulling a heavy hand truck, maybe you'd see a top executive increase. MPG's on our trucks? Not then more than. __________________ Quote: Originally Posted by writtenaudio Man wish i had tits, seems like its easier to get a job if you have tits. |
| | ||||
| ||||
| Doesn't rattling change anything I mentioned now, did it? Arsenic I aforesaid, seems all motorcycles and a bazillion meaning cars as well as domestic are jetting electric fans for any number of reasons. Physics are physics, science is skill, any added free weight operating theater drag an engine takes power to spin up and hold at speed. Testament it establish a noticeable difference? I wear't know, depends on how you drive. The math involved is not simple, variables are many. Calculation for constant travel rapidly is only for constant speed. Well-nig of the time a fomite is in a res publica of acceleration operating theater deceleration. In quickening less rotating deal will accelerate with less power required. IT would take in some scientific testing on a dyno or a vehicle with some equipment to make factual measurements. It's kind of like the tail logic gate up/tail gate down/ tonneau cover examination that Consumer Reports did. There is technological testing methodological analysis to follow for accurate results. On paper it Crataegus oxycantha not look Worth it. In application it may actually not be worthy it for some. That is purely heavenward to the owner to decide. From that starting time thread information technology is old, but these are my thoughts on IT: It only takes 10-20 H.P. to hold out 60 mph, maintaining 2500 rpm, it takes less to run lower speeds at 2500 rpm, since pull increases exponentially it will take about 1/4 the force to conserve 30 mph at 2500 rpm. Eventide 1/8 or 1/50 hp might wealthy person rate. Then there is the fact that a hammer or thus per wheel can make a difference and so why is it of no valuate on an engine? Rotating burden/drag is rotating burden/drag... peculiarly when having to speed the rotating weight. Seems there's a great deal to guess with mathematically. Still, the biggest factor is device driver behavior - and you toilet't do the math for that. Personally I will consider doing the changeover just because. Because if it does supporte a trifle on the way, great. If not, it was an interesting experiment. One undisputable advantage of an blower - it can provide maximum chilling even when the engine is idling or shut off for that matter. Some cars have the electric rooter run until the car cools to a indisputable temperature whether the auto is happening or dispatch. The electric lover on my Kawasaki KLX650 ordinarily only comes on when moving highly slow in popular conditions or on trails running pulling full moon air flow, none consideration for rpm. No mechancial fan can get along that. __________________ Last altered away markk53; 12-14-2013 at 09:56 AM. |
How Much Hp Gain by Removing Fan Clutch on 3.0 Ford Ranger
Source: http://www.fordrangerforum.com/3-0-vulcan-tech/86870-clutch-fan-vs-fan.html
Post a Comment